So the commentators are all towing the Labour Party line that "a vote for the Workers Party (or RAM or Alliance) is a vote for National" first the The CWG, then Steve from The Standard and now Matt McCarton has joined in:
"There will be a temptation for these [staunch left] voters to give their party vote to openly left-wing parties, such as RAM (Residents Action Movement), the Workers Party and the Alliance (my old party). The combined party vote of these left-wing parties will be less than 2 per cent. That will mean all their party votes they get will be allocated proportionately to other parties that make it into parliament.
Interestingly, that means that half of the staunch left vote will be added to National. If these left-wingers instead gave their party vote to the Greens it would give them another two MPs they wouldn't otherwise get.
It is true that if a large percentage of the party vote goes to parties that don't cross the 5% threshold the remaining seats would be divided up between the parties that did, however there will be no remaining seats this election, Jim Anderton, Peter Dunne and almost every Maori Party MP are likely to cause an overhang, meaning there will be extra seats in parliament, so no seats will be given to parties that didn't win them. Hear that? there is no way voting Workers Party will give more seats to National
( more voting myths )